.svg)
EUSRR vs. Hong Kong Convention: The Global Dilemma in Ship Recycling Compliance
The maritime industry is at a pivotaljuncture, navigating complex regulatory waters with two prominent frameworksshaping the future of ship recycling: the Hong Kong International Convention (HKC) and theEuropean Union Ship Recycling Regulation (EUSRR). Both frameworks addresssignificant environmental and occupational safety concerns, but differingstandards and implementation requirements have created confusion andoperational challenges across the sector.
Why Ship Recycling Matters: The Shift from Traditional toSustainable Practices
Historically, ship recycling involvedpractices fraught with environmental and safety hazards, posing risks to bothworkers and ecosystems. The transition toward sustainable ("green")ship recycling - marked by stringent environmental controls and worker safetymeasures is essential for minimizing these hazards. Ensuring consistent,international compliance is therefore critical to achieving meaningful, globalimprovements.
Two Regulatory Frameworks Explained
1. Hong Kong ConventionShip Recycling (HKC)
Adopted by the International MaritimeOrganization (IMO) in May 2009, the HKC is designed to standardizeglobal ship recycling practices, emphasizing safety and environmentalresponsibility. After years of gradual adoption, the Convention is set toofficially enter into force on June 26, 2025.
The key provisions of HKC:
- Inventory of Hazardous Materials (IHM): Ships must carry a certified inventory listing hazardous substances, providing transparency and guiding safe dismantling.
- Ship-Specific Recycling Plan: Recycling facilities must develop detailed, ship-specific recycling plans considering the ship’s IHM and structural characteristics to ensure safe recycling.
- Authorization of Recycling Facilities: Facilities must meet internationally recognized standards for environmental management and worker safety, authorized by national authorities.
- Compliance and Oversight: Enforcement responsibilities lie with individual member states, supported by IMO guidelines and technical assistance.
The HKC has been ratified by 24countries, collectively accounting for 57.73% of the global shippingfleet. This group includes key ship recycling nations such as India,Bangladesh, Turkey, Pakistan, and Japan,underscoring the convention’s wide international endorsement and practicalrelevance.
2. European Union ShipRecycling Regulation (EUSRR)
Introduced by the European Union in 2013,with full implementation commencing December 31, 2020, EUSRR primarily affects EU-flaggedships and those docking at EU ports. While built upon principles similar toHKC, EUSRR specifically addresses EU regional compliance.
The key provisions of EUSRR:
- Hazardous Material Restrictions: Limitations on hazardous substances for EU-flagged ships.
- Certified Inventory of Hazardous Materials: Mandated for all ships over 500 GT entering EU ports.
- EU-Approved Recycling Facilities ("EU List"): EU-flagged ships must recycle at facilities approved by the EU.
The EUSRR's regional applicability has inadvertentlyintroduced operational complexities, especially for major recycling nationsoutside Europe, such as India and Bangladesh, due to differing compliancerequirements.
Vienna Convention: Understanding Global Legal Dynamics
Under Article 30 of the ViennaConvention on the Law of Treaties (1969), when treaties overlap, the one with broaderinternational acceptance generally holds greater global weight. The HKC,ratified by key global recycling nations, offers inclusive and flexibleimplementation aligned with World Trade Organization (WTO) principles.Conversely, the EUSRR’s regional application limits its global practicality,creating operational complexity.
The Cost of Regulatory Conflict
The coexistence of HKC and EUSRR createsconfusion and operational inefficiencies. Shipowners and recycling facilitiesnavigating differing regulations face complexity in global industry alignment.Without harmonization, regulatory fragmentation risks impeding environmentalprogress and sustaining unsafe practices, especially in regions facingcompliance challenges.
Final Thoughts: Advocating for Global Harmonization
The maritime industry faces a clear choice:fragmented regional regulations or uniting behind a globally recognizedframework. Given its extensive international collaboration andratification, adopting HKC universally is essential for promoting industry-widesustainable practices. Global stakeholders, including the European Union,should consider aligning with HKC to foster operational clarity, environmentalprotection, and safety worldwide.
FAQs
1. What is the differencebetween the EUSRR and the Hong Kong Convention (HKC)?
EUSRR is an EU-specific regulation binding EU-flaggedships and ships docking at EU ports. HKC is globally applicable with broaderinternational ratification, promoting global consistency.
2. How does the HKC improveship recycling standards?
HKC standardizes global recycling practices through detailed hazardousmaterials inventories and internationally recognized facility requirements,enforced by national authorities.
3. Will the HKC becomemandatory globally?
The HKC enters into force on June 26, 2025,becoming mandatory for ships flying flags of countries that ratify it.
4. Why is there a dilemma inglobal ship recycling compliance?
The dilemma arises from two overlapping frameworks: globally recognized HKC andthe region-specific EUSRR, creating operational complexity due to differingapplicability.
5. Which countries support theHKC?
HKC is supported and ratified by major recycling nations like India, Bangladesh,Turkey, Pakistan, and Japan, ensuring its widespreadacceptance and practical applicability globally.
